Disposed

Jalindar Pandu Khandagale and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC17 Jul 2018WP/323/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought directions for payment of compensation for land acquired since 1991. The Court directed Respondents to deposit the determined compensation amount with the Collector within three months for immediate disbursement after deposit by the acquiring body, noting an Award dated 2.9.2017 requiring Rs.73,56,308.

What did the court decide?

Directed Respondents to deposit compensation determined by the Land Acquisition Officer with the Collector within three months for disbursement to petitioners upon deposit by the acquiring body.

Jalindar Pandu Khandagale and Others Vs the State of… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

wp 323.18.odt

¶2

{1}

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

11 WRIT PETITION NO. 323 OF 2018

¶5

JALINDAR PANDU KHANDAGALE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶6

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. C.K.Shinde AGP for Respondents:Mr. V.S. Badakh Advocate for Respondent No.5 :Mr. S.B. Patil

¶7

CORAM : R. M. BORDE & ARUN M. DHAVALE, JJ. Date: July 17, 2018

¶8

PER COURT :-

¶9

1 The petitioners are praying for directions to the respondents to pass Award in respect of the land already taken in possession and to pay the amount of compensation.

¶10

2 An affidavit in reply has been presented on behalf of respondent Nos.1, 6 and 7, wherein, it has been stated that the Award in consonance with the provisions of The Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013 has been declared on 2.9.2017 and a demand for compensation amount Rs.73,56,308 has been submitted to the acquiring body on 25.10.2017. It is further stated that the acquiring body has not deposited the amount of compensation and as and when the acquiring

¶11

wp 323.18.odt

¶12

{2}

¶13

body deposits the amount, the same would be disbursed to the petitioner.

¶14

3 Looking to the fact that the petitioners have been deprived of their landed property since 1991, the respondent need to be directed to pay the amount of compensation to the petitioners expeditiously. In this view of the matter, respondent Nos.2 to 5 are directed to deposit amount of compensation determined by the Land Acquisition Officer with the Collector, District: Beed i.e. respondent No.6 for disbursement of the same to the petitioners, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within three months from today and it is accordingly directed. On deposit of the amount of compensation by the acquiring body, the same shall be disbursed to the petitioner forth with.

¶15

3 With the directions as above, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶16

( ARUN M. DHAVALE, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )

¶17

vbd

Jalindar Pandu Khandagale and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jalindar Pandu Khandagale and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudarshan Suresh Akhadmal through Father Suresh Manga Akhadmal Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Sagar Vinayak Sapkal Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Ashwini Sudhir Pawar Vs the Union of India and Others

Balram Devarambhai Chawda Dna Others Vs the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation through Its Commissioner

Maharashtra Rajya Prathmik Shikshak Sangh through Its Ahmednagar District President Sanjay Mohan Sh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shiveshwar Majoor Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit through Secretary Lakshman Ramkisan Thombre Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others