The petitioner, seeking leave to withdraw Writ Petition No. 3010 of 2014 based on an email instruction, requested withdrawal. The Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition was allowed; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(30) WP 3010-14.doc
Amk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3010 OF 2014
Upendra K. Kudva .. Petitioner Vs. Mumbai Municipal Corporation & Ors. .. Respondents
Ms. Dipti Kuber I/b Shukla Devmani Jagdish & Mr. Vijay Prakash Yadav for the Petitioner.
Mr. A. K. Nandanwar for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4-MCGM.
CORAM : R. M. SAVANT & K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 12th SEPTEMBER, 2018.
P. C.
The learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on the basis of the instructions received by email addressed to Mr. Vijay Prakash Yadav informing him to withdraw the Petition, seeks leave to withdraw the above Petition. The Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Copy of the email is taken on record and marked ' X ' for identification.
[K. K. SONAWANE, J.] [R. M. SAVANT, J.]
Digitally signed by Arjun Arjun Machhindra Machhindra Kadam Kadam Date: 2018.09.14 14:06:49 +0530
1/1
Upendra K. Kudva
Mumbai Municipal Corporation
R. M. Savant
K. K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
