Petition was disposed of as being infructuous following the trial court's conclusion that it lacked pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain the suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2941 OF 2017
WITH CA/1981/2018 IN WP/2941/2017
BALASAHEB RAOSAHEB DESHMUKH AND OTHERS VERSUS BHAUSAHEB RAOSAHEB DESHMUKH AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Shri Kute R.L.h/f Shri Dhorde V.R. Advocate for Respondents : Smt. Mohale R.M. h/f Shri Choudhari S.S.
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. Dated: July 12, 2018 ...
PER COURT :-
27.3.2018 cited by the learned counsel, this petition is disposed off as being infructuous. The Civil Application does not survive and stands disposed off.
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
akl/d
BALASAHEB RAOSAHEB DESHMUKH AND OTHERS
BHAUSAHEB RAOSAHEB DESHMUKH AND OTHERS
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
