Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to lack of appearance by the petitioner.
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2935/2016
(Suresh s/o Motiram Ninave vs. Western Coalfields Ltd. And others )
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. M.Anilkumar, Adv.for respondent no.3
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 6th February, 2018.
JUDGE JUDGE
sahare
Suresh s/o Motiram Ninave
Western Coalfields Ltd. And others
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
