The High Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 2866 of 2006 as the relief claimed had become infructuous. Consequently, the connected Civil Application also stood disposed of without costs.
Writ Petition disposed of with rule discharged and no costs; Civil Application also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 2866.06
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2866 OF 2006 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5506 OF 2007
Ashlesha Anil Shimpi and another.. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others.. Respondents
Mr. A. S. Bajaj and Mr. S. P. Adgaonkar, Advocates
for the Petitioners.
Mrs. M. A. Deshpande, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.
1, 2 and 4.
Mr. V. D. Salunke, Advocate for Respondent No. 3.
CORAM:S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
S. M. GAVHANE, JJ.
DATE:4 th September, 2018
PER COURT :
1.The learned counsel for the petitioners
submits that with the passage of time the relief
claimed has become infructuous.
2.Writ Petition as such is disposed of. Rule
discharged. No costs.
3.In view of disposal of the writ petition,
civil application also stands disposed of.
[S. M. GAVHANE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
marathe
Ashlesha Anil Shimpi
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
S. M. Gavhane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court