This High Court disposed of consolidated writ petitions by directing the respondent to decide the petitioner's appeal within three months after affording an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties.
Writ petitions disposed; direction given to respondent to decide the appeal within three months with due hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 221 OF 2018 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 222 OF 2018 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 223 OF 2018 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 286 OF 2018
Parvez Mohd. Shafi Shaikh .. Petitioner Vs. Additional Collector and ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Gauraj Shah i/b Mr.Tejas D.Shah, for the Petitioner. Mr.Milind More, Additional G.P., for State.
CORAM : SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR & M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 02nd APRIL, 2018
P.C. :
. Parties through their Counsel. With the consent of
the parties heard finally.
1/2
respondent No.1 to consider and decide his Appeal – Exhibit 'A' as expeditiously as possible.
of.
( M.S.KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR, J.)
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent should be directed to dispose of the petitioner's appeal within three months with due hearing.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Parvez Mohd. Shafi Shaikh
Additional Collector
SHANTANU S KEMKAR
M S KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
