This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
12wp271o18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 271 OF 2018
AASHISH AASHUTOSH SHAMKANT SHUKL
VERSUS
BHUSHAN RAMDAS CHOUDHARY AND OTHERS
Advocate for the Petitioner : Shri Deshpande Chaitanya C. h/f Shri C.C.Deshpande.
Advocate for Respondent 1 : Shri Gujarathi Yatish G..
CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
DATE :- 12th March, 2018
Per Court:
Rashtriya Kamgar Sangh and others, 2006 (3) Mh.L.J. 646 and the order
passed by this Court (Coram : S.V.Gangapurwala, J.) dated 26.03.2013 in
Writ Petition No.1845/2013 (Ankush Raghunath Deshmukh vs. Balasaheb
Raghunath Deshmukh ) is that a defendant, who has jointly submitted the Written Statement with other co-defendants, cannot be permitted to amend the Written Statement and he may opt for moving an application for seeking permission to file the additional Written Statement.
2 12wp271o18
on instructions that the Petitioner desires to withdraw this petition and he would resort to a remedy as is permissible in law.
4 Considering the above, this Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. The Petitioner may resort to a remedy as is permissible in law. All contentions of all the litigating sides are kept open.
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
kps
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
GTA Limited vs. Maharashtra Rajya Rashtriya Kamgar Sangh and othersReferred¶14
GTA Limited vs. Maharashtra Rajya Rashtriya Kamgar Sangh and others, 2006 (3) Mh.L.J. 646 · Who else cites this
Ankush Raghunath Deshmukh vs. Balasaheb Raghunath DeshmukhReferred¶17
Writ Petition No.1845/2013 (Ankush Raghunath Deshmukh vs. Balasaheb Raghunath Deshmukh)
AASHISH AASHUTOSH SHAMKANT SHUKL
BHUSHAN RAMDAS CHOUDHARY
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
