Petitioners sought permission to withdraw the writ petition following submission of representations. The bench allowed withdrawal and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn upon permission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SKN
1/1 2649.17-wp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2649 OF 2017
Krishnakant Vasantrao Raskar and others. … Petitioners. V/s. Pune Municipal Corporation and others. … Respondents.
Mr.Vishwajeet S. Kapse for the petitioners. Mr.Rajdeep S. Khadapkar for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mrs.R.A.Salunkhe, AGP for respondent Nos.3 and 4.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATE : 6th June 2018.
P.C.:
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners states that the petitioners want to pursue their representations, the copies of which are annexed as Exh.I (collectively). He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw this petition. Accordingly, petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.)
Krishnakant Vasantrao Raskar
Pune Municipal Corporation
A.S.OKA
RIYAZ I. CHAGLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
