Allowed
Sahyog and Company v. the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 3 Ors.
Bombay HCWP/2619/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
10-wp-2619-18.doc
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2619 OF 2018
M/s. Sahyog & Company .. Petitioner
Vs.
Dr. Birendra Saraf a/w Mr. Ranjeev Carvalho I/by Bipin Joshi for petitioner.
Ms. Vandana Mahadik for MCGM.
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL, ACTING CJ. & G. S. KULKARNI, J.
SEPTEMBER 19, 2018.
P.C.
Heard learned counsel for the parties. We have perused the impugned circular.
In the facts of the case, we observe that the Petitioner is entitled to file a comprehensive representation in respect of the subject matter to the Municipal Corporation. If such representation of the petitioner is received, the same may be looked into within six weeks from the date of its receipt by the Corporation.
With the aforesaid observations and keeping all issues open, petition is disposed of with liberty.
Pravin Dasharath Pandit
G. S. KULKARNI J. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
Digitally signed by Pravin Dasharath Pandit Date: 2018.09.24 10:34:43 +0530
M/s. Sahyog & Company
The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai
NARESH H. PATIL
G. S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court