This two judge bench disposed of Writ Petition No. 261 of 2005 by consent, relying on the principle laid down in three earlier related writ petitions disposed of on the same date, without recording any substantive arguments or facts.
The petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2 wp 261-05=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 261 OF 2005
Smt. Room Mukharjee & Anr.
… Petitioners
V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
… Respondents
Mr. S.G. Surana for the Petitioner.
Mr. Milind More, AGP for the Respondent No.1.
CORAM : CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. DATE : 09th APRIL, 2018
P.C.:
. It is stated that the issue raised in this petition is common to Writ Petition
Nos. 755 of 2004 (Ghanshyamdas Agarwal & Anr. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.), 898 of 2004 (M/s. Kings Construction Company V/s. State of Maharashtra and Ors.) and 1275 of 2004 (Suresh Chanchaldas Asrani V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.), which have been disposed of on 12.03.2018. In view of the said judgment, even this petition can be disposed of by consent of both the sides in terms of the above judgment.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
(S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
1/1
Sneha Chavan
Smt. Room Mukharjee & Anr.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
PRAKASH D. NAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
