The High Court dismissed four criminal writ petitions for want of prosecution as the petitioner-in-person failed to appear on two consecutive dates scheduled for hearing.
The criminal writ petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)-WP-2600 & group matters.sxw
BDPSPS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2600 OF 2013
Prakash Laxman Chanderkar ..Petitioner Versus Babasaheb Darekar and others ..Respondents
ALONGWITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2601 OF 2013
Prakash Laxman Chanderkar ..Petitioner Versus Shri. L. T. Sawant and others ..Respondents
ALONGWITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2602 OF 2013
Prakash Laxman Chanderkar ..Petitioner Versus Aravind Valanju and another ..Respondents
ALONGWITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2603 OF 2013
Prakash Laxman Chanderkar ..Petitioner Versus Nidhi Pande and others ..Respondents
Petitioner-in-person in all the Writ Petitions - Absent. Mrs. M. H. Mhatre, APP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM: B. R. GAVAI & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATE: 17th JANUARY, 2018
1/2
(1)-WP-2600 & group matters.sxw
P.C.:-
1] When the matters were called out on 10/01/2018, Petitioner in person did not appear. However, to give one more opportunity to him, the matters were directed to be placed today. Today also, none appears for the Petitioner.
2] Petitions are therefore dismissed for want of prosecution.
2/2
Prakash Laxman Chanderkar
Babasaheb Darekar
Shri. L. T. Sawant
Aravind Valanju
Nidhi Pande
B. R. Gavai
B. P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
