This court held a petition withdrawn without prejudice to the contentions. The petitioner sought leave to file an application before the trial court. All contentions remain open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 2530-17.doc
Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2530 OF 2017
Mitul Pravin Vora & ors.
.Petitioners
Vs.
Bhakti Mitul Vora & anr.
.Respondents
Mr. P. N. Vira, Advocate, for the Petitioners Mr. K. Garg, Advocate, for the Respondent No. 1 Mr. S. R. Shinde, APP, for the Respondent No. 2 – State
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 30.01.2018
P.C.
. In view of the Judgment of this Court (Coram : A. S. OKA & A. A. SAYED, JJ.) dated 27.10.2016 passed in Cri. W. P. No. 2473 of
2016, learned counsel for the Petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this
Petition with liberty to file an appropriate Application before the trial Court.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Cri. W. P. No. 2473 of 2016Referred¶12
Mitul Pravin Vora
Bhakti Mitul Vora
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
