The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the denial of promotion as infructuous because the petitioner had opted for voluntary retirement before the decision was finalized. No substantive relief was granted.
None. Petition disposed of as infructuous due to voluntary retirement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(37) wp-2517.15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2517 OF 2015
Shrikrishna Vishram Tanawade : Petitioner. Versus
Bank of Baroda and anr. : Respondents.
Mr. A L Gore i/by Mrs. Yogita R Singh for the Petitioner. Mr. V M Parkar for the Respondent No.1.
CORAM : R. M. SAVANT & K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 05th SEPTEMBER 2018
P.C.
1 In view of the supervening event of the Petitioner opting for voluntary retirement, the challenge in the above Writ Petition to the denial of promotion to the Petitioner has turned infructuous. The above Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of as having turned infructuous.
[K. K. SONAWANE, J]
[R.M.SAVANT, J]
Laxmikant Gopal Chandan
Digitally signed by Laxmikant Gopal Chandan Date: 2018.09.06 17:55:00 +0530
1 of 1
lgc
Shrikrishna Vishram Tanawade
Bank of Baroda
R. M. Savant
K. K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court