The High Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition challenging the refusal of a temporary injunction, keeping their contentions before the Executing Court open.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn. Contentions before the Executing Court kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2423 OF 2018
IRANI @ SARASWATIBAI BASWANTAPPA MATHPATI (SWAMI) AND ANOTHER VERSUS SULANBAI SAMBAYAAPPA MATHPATI (SWAMI) AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. C.V. Thombre.
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. DATED : 06th March, 2018
PER COURT :
2
of Civil Procedure. The petition, is therefore, disposed
of as withdrawn.
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
S.P.C.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are permitted to withdraw the writ petition regarding the refusal of a temporary injunction.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Irani @ Saraswatibai Baswantappa Mathpati (Swami)
Another
Sulanbai Sambayappa Mathpati (Swami)
Others
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
