The High Court directed the Education Officer to decide a proposal for the petitioner's appointment as junior clerk within four weeks and adjourned him to appear personally.
Direction to Education Officer to decide appointment proposal within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1977 OF 2018
Prashant Sudhakar Pandit. Versus The Education Officer (Secondary) and Others.
..Petitioner. ..Respondents.
Mr. I. M. Khairdi for the Petitioner.
Mr. A. I. Patel, AGP for the Respondent-State.
Coram : Ranjit More & Smt. S. S. Jadhav, JJ. Date : March 16, 2018 .
P. C. :
1 / 2
patilsr
of the matter and concerned Education Officer shall decide the said proposal about the appointment of the Petitioner independently, on its own merits and strictly in accordance with law.
of this order and copy of the said proposal.
[Smt. S. S. JADHAV, J.]
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
2 / 2
patilsr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Education Officer should decide the proposal for the petitioner's appointment as junior clerk within a specified timeframe.
Prashant Sudhakar Pandit
The Education Officer (Secondary)
Others
Shri. Shivajibhau Baba Patil Vidyalay
Ranjit More
S. S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
