The High Court of Bombay at Bombay Civil Appellate Jurisdiction disposed of the writ petition as infructuous since the petitioner was promoted during the pendency of the petition.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ISM
1 212.1950.06 wp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1950 OF 2006
Shreedhar Ganesh Kulkarni
.....Petitioner
V/s.
District and Sessions Judge, Satara and Ors .....Respondents
None for the petitioner
Mr. M. M. Pable AGP for the State
Mr. Rajshekhar V. Govilkar a/w Ms. Shaba N. Khan for respondent nos. 1 & 2.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR AND
NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 14, 2018.
P.C.
None for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the respondent
has pointed out para 8 of the reply filed by the respondents which
reads thus:
“8. Though the Petitioner was not promoted earlier, later on, by an order dated 16.05.2006, he was promoted as a senior clerk. Further, in the very recent past, the Petitioner has been promoted by an order dated 28.02.2017 on a further higher post as Assistant Superintendent with effect from 01.03.2017 and as on today, the Petitioner has been working on the post of the Assistant Superintendent in the Civil Court, Phaltan, District Satara ”
2 212.1950.06 wp
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.] [SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.]
Shreedhar Ganesh Kulkarni
District and Sessions Judge, Satara
Shantanu Kemkar
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
