The Bench disposed of the writ petition without expressing any opinion on the merits after confirming that the respondent had complied with earlier orders by crediting the petitioner's bank account. Petitioners' rights are balanced as an appeal is pending.
Bank account of the petitioner released from attachment; writ petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18-WPL-2912.2017.doc
suresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION {L} NO.2912 OF 2017
Pragnesh B. Solanki .... Petitioner Vs. Union of India & Others .... Respondents
Ms Deepali Kamble for the Petitioner. Ms P.S. Cardozo for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 15, 2018
P.C:
were passed by the Division Bench and in the presence of the parties is the compliance of the same. There was a dispute about the compliance. Now a compliance affidavit has been filed whereafter also the grievance of the petitioner's Advocate was
Page 1 of 3
suresh 18-WPL-2912.2017.doc
that the amount has not been brought in the bank account of the petitioner.
Page 2 of 3
suresh
18-WPL-2912.2017.doc
All contentions are kept open.
(SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pragnesh B. Solanki
Union of India
S.C. Dharmadhikari
Bharati H. Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
