Dismissed
Shaikh Zaibunnisa Mohammed Usman v. the State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors.
Bombay HCWP/1855/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(903)-WP-1855-17.doc .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1855 OF 2017
Shaikh Zaibunnisa Mohammed Usman ..Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. Manish Upadhye, AGP for Respondent No.1. Mr. H. C. Pimple, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 – MCGM. Mr. Jitendra M. Pathade, Advocate for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 19th JANUARY, 2018
P.C.
1] When the matter was listed on 12th January 2018, none appeared for the Petitioner. As such, the matter was directed to be listed for dismissal today. Today also, none appears for the Petitioner.
2] Even otherwise, from the perusal of the pleadings, it would reveal that the Petition involves various disputed question of facts and law, which cannot be exercised by this Court in its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Petition is rejected by relegating to the remedy available to him in ordinary law.
[B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.]
[B. R. GAVAI, J.]
1 of 1
BGP.
Shaikh Zaibunnisa Mohammed Usman
The State of Maharashtra
Others
B. R. Gavai
B. P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court