This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp-1807.18.docx
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1807 OF 2018
Mr. Suresh Narayan Jagdale & Ors.
… Petitioners
Vs.
The Collector & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Kshitij Kadam a/w Priyanka Pandya I/by Rustamji & Ginwala for the Petitioners.
Ms. Geeta Shastri, Addl. G.P. for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 14th DECEMBER 2018.
P.C. :
. Not on board. Taken on board.
1 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has placed on record a copy of letter dated 3rd December 2018 addressed by the Tahasildar (Revenue), Mumbai Suburban District. The letter is taken on record and marked ‘L1’ for identification. In view of the said letter, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.)
1 of 1
Mr. Suresh Narayan Jagdale & Ors.
The Collector & Anr.
A.S. Oka
Sandeep K. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court