Disposed

Bharati Jaysing Mali v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Transport Dept. and Anr.

Bombay HC4 Dec 2018WP/1782/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay disposed of a writ petition by granting leave to the retired petitioner to withdraw the proceedings. The court directed the appropriate authority to decide the petition's subject matter expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn; the petitioner is permitted to apply for pension and gratuity to the second respondent.

Bharati Jaysing Mali Vs State of Maharashtra… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2018)

wp1782.doc

ssp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.1782 OF 2015

¶6

Bharati Jaysing Mali
vs.
State of Maharashtra
and Others

¶7

...Petitioner

¶8

...Respondents

¶9

Mr.R.K.Mendadkar a/w Mr.T.V.Jadhav for the
Petitioner

¶10

Mr.P.P.More, AGP for the respondent No.1

¶11

Mr.C.M.Lokesh I/b Mr.G.S.Hegde for respondent No.2

¶12

CORAM : A.S.OKA, &

¶13

 SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.
 DATE : DECEMBER 4, 2018

¶14

P.C.:

¶15

1The learned counsel for the petitioner states
that the petitioner has superannuated during the
pendency of this petition. We accept the said
statement. He states that now the petitioner will
apply for payment of gratuity and pension and
therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to
withdraw this petition. The learned counsel for the
second respondent opposes the prayer.

¶16

2The petitioner wants to withdraw this petition.
The said prayer deserves to be granted. Accordingly,
we pass the following order:

¶17

(I) Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn;

¶18

2 wp1782.doc

¶19

(II) It will be open for the petitioner to make an
application to the second respondent for grant of
gratuity and pension. Such application shall be
decided by the second respondent as expeditiously as
possible;

¶20

(III) We make it clear that we have made no
adjudication on the question whether the petitioner
is entitled to the said benefits.

¶21

(SANDEEP K.SHINDE,J.) (A.S.OKA,J.)

Bharati Jaysing Mali v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Transport Dept. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bharati Jaysing Mali v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Transport Dept. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aviation Industry Employees Guild Vs Air India Ltd. and 12 Ors.

Aviation Industry Employees Guild Vs Air India Ltd. and 12 Ors. and All India Service Engineers Association (Applicant)

Shrikant Mangesh Thakur Vs Shri. S. D. Golai, Chairman Thr. Its Member Secretary and Ors.

Amar Ramchandra Bhalerao Vs Education Inspector (West Zone) and Ors.

Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. and Anr. Vs the Collector of Mumbai and 3 Ors.

Shri. Lasanna Venkanna Dharap (Since Decd) through Lrs, Smt. Ammai Lasanna Dharap Vs the General Manager, Kohinoor Mills and Ors.