Disposed

Maharashtra Wholesale Wine Merchants Association and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary Home Dept. and Ors.

Bombay HC16 Mar 2018WP/1544/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay disposed of a writ petition by a fresh direction to the respondent authority to consider the petitioners' representations for a refund of excess licence fee as expeditiously as possible, preferably within four months, and directed them to appear before the respondent on a specified date.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondent no. 2 to consider representations for refund of excess licence fee within four months and directing appearance on 3rd April, 2018.

Maharashtra Wholesale Wine Merchants… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

914-wp-11544.2018.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.1544 OF 2018

¶5

Maharashtra Wholesale Wine Merchants Association and Ors.

¶6

...Petitioners

¶7

Vs.

¶8

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

¶9

...Respondents

¶10

Mr.D.B. Sawant a/w Mr.Vinayak Salokhe, Ramesh Lad and Megha Jani for the Petitioners.

¶11

Mr.Sandeep Babar, AGP for the Respondent-State.

¶12

CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : MARCH 16, 2018

¶13

P.C. :

¶14

Petitioners are wholesale wine merchants. They are seeking direction against the respondent no.2 to consider their request for refund of the excess amount of licence fee paid by them for the year 2016-17. According to the petitioners, they have submitted various representations including representations dated 7.7.2017 and 3.11.2017 filed along with the petition for consideration of their request for refund but till date no decision on the said representations has been taken by the respondent no. 2.

¶15

Today when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel

¶16

1/2

¶17

nilegaonkar

¶18

914-wp-11544.2018.odt

¶19

for the petitioners made a limited prayer that this petition be disposed of by directing respondent no. 2 to consider and take appropriate decision on the said representations filed by the petitioners.

¶20

Keeping in view the aforesaid limited prayer and without commenting upon the merits of the matter and petitioner's entitlement, we dispose of this petition by directing respondent no. 2 to consider and take appropriate decision on the representations

¶21

of the petitioners in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within four months from the date of appearance of the petitioners before him.

¶22

The petitioners or their representatives are directed to appear

¶23

before respondent no. 2 on 3^rd April, 2018 at 3.00 pm.

¶24

With the aforesaid observations, petition is disposed of.

¶25

(M.S. KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)

¶26

2/2

¶27

nilegaonkar

Maharashtra Wholesale Wine Merchants Association and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary Home Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maharashtra Wholesale Wine Merchants Association and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary Home Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prafull Harishchandra Kamble Vs Add.Collector (Enc) / (Rem)

Parimal Harishchanra Kokate Vs Additional Collector (Enc)/(Rem) Eastern Suburbs and 6 Ors.

Sou. Chhaya Vinayak Ghare Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Girni Kamgar Sabha and 35 Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and 5 Ors.

Nagar Parishad Gharfala Vadh Virodhi Kruti Samiti Kurundwad through Shri. Sunil Balwant Kurundwde Vs the Chief Secreatary the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Sharad Baliram Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Chief Secretary and Anr.