Disposed

Bhaskar Mohanrao Kawade v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC10 Sept 2018WP/14707/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, owner of agricultural lands, sought directions to measure the land flooded by a nearby tank and to grant compensation via acquisition. The Court directed the District Collector and Tahsildar to communicate with the TILR to complete the measurement within four weeks and for the Executive Engineer to decide on the report thereafter.

What did the court decide?

Directions to District Collector and Tahsildar to ensure TILR completes land measurement within four weeks and submits a report to the Executive Engineer for a decision.

Bhaskar Mohanrao Kawade Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

WP/14707/2017

¶2

1 of 3

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 14707 OF 2017

¶5

BHASKAR MOHANRAO KAWADE

¶6

VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶7

Advocate for Petitioner : Shri A.T.Kanwale h/f Shri V.S.Undre AGP for Respondents 1 & 2 : Shri G.D.Wattamwar Advocate for Respondents 3 & 4 : Shri Ram Deshpande

¶8

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, JJ. Dated: September 10, 2018

¶9

PER COURT :-

¶10

The petitioner is before this Court with a limited prayer, namely; direction to respondent No.3 to decide his representations dated 4.1.2017 and 17.10.2017 respectively.

¶11

Notice was issued on 20.12.2017 by this Court. The learned AGP appeared and waived service for respondents 1 and 2. Shri Deshpande, learned counsel has appeared for respondents 3 and 4.

¶12

On perusal of the representation dated 4.1.2017, placed on record at Exhibit "C", it appears that the petitioner is owner of certain agricultural lands in Gut Nos.369 and 366 as well as Gut No.364. It is submitted in the representations that the petitioner is in possession of the lands and is also cultivating the lands. The grievance of the

¶13

WP/14707/2017

¶14

2 of 3

¶15

petitioner seems to be of not taking steps so as to verify the area merged in the water. The petitioner submitted in the representations that the agricultural lands could not be cultivated by the petitioner due to the water overflowing from the tank constructed nearby the agricultural lands. The petitioner in the representations requested respondent No.3 / Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation, Osmanabad Division, Osmanabad to take necessary steps to measure the lands and forward the proposal to the department so also grant compensation by acquisition of the lands.

¶16

Shri Deshpande, learned Advocate, on instructions submits that on receiving the representations, the Executive Engineer immediately requested the Taluka Inspector of Land Records ("TILR") to undertake the exercise of the measurement of the land. On 24.10.2017, respondent No.3 / Executive Engineer requested the TILR to measure the lands. Again a reminder was forwarded on 24.8.2018. As no steps were taken, again a reminder dated 5.9.2018 was sent to the TILR.

¶17

Considering the limited grievance raised by the petitioner and considering the submission of Shri Deshpande that respondent No.3 forwarded the communication to the TILR to do the needful and till date the communication is pending compliance with the TILR, we are of the opinion that the petition itself can be disposed off by issuing

¶18

WP/14707/2017

¶19

3 of 3

¶20

necessary directions to the respondents. Accordingly, we direct the District Collector, Osamanbad to appraise the Tahsildar, Tq. Washi, District Osmanabad and the Tahsildar, in turn, shall immediately establish contact with the TILR and apprise him about the communication submitted by the Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Osmanabad on 24.10.2017, 24.8.2018 and 5.9.2018. The District Collector, Osmanabad shall also intimate the Tahsildar and the Tahsildar, in turn, shall intimate to the TILR to undertake the exercise of measurement, if not taken till date, and to complete the same within four weeks from today and submit the report to respondent No.3 / Executive Engineer. Respondent No.3 on receipt of such report of TILR to take appropriate decision and communicate the same to the petitioner four weeks from the date of receipt of the report from the TILR. We are also of the opinion that such an exercise would not cause any prejudice to the respondents and would only meet the ends of justice.

¶21

Digitally signed by Ajay Ajay KishanraoLosarwar Kishanrao Date: Losarwar 2018.09.14 10:04:24 +0530

¶22

With these directions, the Writ Petition is disposed off.

¶23

( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) ( PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. )

¶24

akl

Bhaskar Mohanrao Kawade v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhaskar Mohanrao Kawade v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Savita Vilas Telange Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sitaram Hajarimal Mantri Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Vaishali Walmikrao Bagul Vs Prerna Trust Aurangabad through Its Secretary and Others