Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging lower court orders rejecting his prayer for discharge. The single-judge Bench held that since the charge was already framed, prayers for discharge could not be considered, dismissing the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 1405 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 1405 OF 2015
Rajendra Kalicharan Verma
...Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
Mr.Rajendra K. Verma -Party in person present Mrs. S.S. Kaushik -APP for the State ******
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE: MARCH 7, 2018
P.C.
an advocate is arguing this matter in person. He makes request for adjourning the matter.
Petitioner is challenging the orders of the Learned Magistrate and the Learned Sessions Judge rejecting prayer for discharge.
1/2
V.A. Tikam
WP 1405 of 2015
Hence, writ petition No. 1405 of 2015 stands dismissed.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
2/2
V.A. Tikam
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the orders rejecting prayer for discharge should be allowed.
Rajendra Kalicharan Verma
The State of Maharashtra
NITIN W. SAMBRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
