Allowed

Shivdas Aasupati Thorat and Ors. v. the Asstt. Commissioner, Social Welfare Office and Ors.

Bombay HC23 Oct 2018WP/13418/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed a writ petition invoking Article 226 w.r.t Article 227, holding that private aided school teachers in Maharashtra are entitled to the Assured Career Progression Scheme if they meet eligibility criteria corresponding to non-teaching staff. It directed the State to examine individual cases within six months.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition allowed; ACPS benefits extended subject to eligibility; authorities to examine cases within six months.

Shivdas Aasupati Thorat and Ors. Vs the Asstt… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

Judg.910.wpst.15797.17.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 15797 OF 2017

¶4

Vijaya Gourishankar Yadav

¶5

1.	Shivdas Aasupati Thorat
	Aged Adult, Occupation – Service, residing
	at Khamgaon, Taluka Barshi, District Solapur.
2.	Anant Dhondiba Shinde
	Age Adult, Occupation – Service, Residing
	at Khamgaon, Taluka Barshi, District Solapur.
3.	Mahesh Dattatray Kurund
	Age Adult, Occupation – Service, Residing
	at Khamgaon, Taluka Barshi, District Solapur.
4.	Vijay Narayan Surwase
	Age Adult, Occupation – Service, Residing
	at Khamgaon, Taluka Barshi, District Solapur.
5.	Mankarna Bharat Gapat
	Age Adult, Occupation – Service, Residing
	at Khamgaon, Taluka Barshi, District Solapur.
6.	Shri Borade Anant Sadashiv
	Age Adult, Occupation – Service, Residing
	at Khamgaon, Taluka Barshi, District Solapur.
7.	Shri Edake Santosh Vishvanath
	Age Adult, Occupation – Service, Residing
	at Khamgaon, Taluka Barshi, District Solapur.

¶6

Digitally signed by Vijaya Gourishankar Yadav Date: 2018.10.26 15:29:47 +0530

¶7

1/5

¶8

Yadav VG

¶9

Judg.910.wpst.15797.17.odt

¶10

8.	Shri Rohile Vitthal Balasaheb Age Adult, Occupation – Service, Residing at Khamgaon, Taluka Barshi, District Solapur.
9.	Head Master, Secondary Ashram School Khamgaon, Taluka Barshi, District Solapur.
10.	Head Master, Primary Ashram School Khamgaon, Taluka Barshi, District Solapur.
11.	Chairman/Secretary, Shivaji Gram Krishivikas Mandal Khamgaon, Taluka Barshi, District Solapur.	…PETITIONERS
	V E R S U S
1.	The Assistant Commissioner Social Welfare Office, Solapur.
2.	The Secretary Social Welfare & Justice Department.
3.	The Director VJNT, OBC & SBS, Welfare Department, Pune.
4.	The State of Maharashtra (Notice of Respondent Nos.1 to 4 be served upon the office of AGP, High Court, A.S.Mumbai.	…RESPONDENTS

¶11

Mr. Amol Dhamal I/by Mr. Umesh Kurund for the Petitioners. Mr. B. V. Samant, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 – State.

¶12

CORAM	: R. M. SAVANT AND
	NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ.
DATE	: 23^rdOCTOBER 2018.

¶13

2/5

¶14

Yadav VG

¶15

Judg.910.wpst.15797.17.odt

¶16

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶17

. Rule, having regard to the nature of the directions to be issued made returnable forthwith and heard.

¶18

The writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is invoked for seeking directions to the Respondents to make available the benefits of the Assured Career Progression Scheme (herein after be referred to as 'the ACPS' for the sake of brevity) to the Petitioners who are working as Teachers in private aided Ashram Schools.

¶19

Insofar as the said issue is concerned, the same is no more res integra and is covered by the Judgment of a Division Bench of this Court ( Coram : A.S.Oka & Revati Mohite Dere, JJ. ) dated 21^st September 2013 rendered in Writ Petition No. 2358 of 2013 (Kiran Namdeo Shinde and Ors. V/s The State of Maharashtra, through Secretary Social Welfare Department and Ors.) and companion Writ Petitions.

¶20

Insofar as the issue as to whether the benefit of ACPS can be extended to the employees of the Ashram Schools are concerned, the finding of the Division Bench is found in paragraph nos.17, 18 and 19 of the said Judgment. In view of the fact that the cases of the individual Petitioners in the said Writ Petitions who are required to be considered for

¶21

3/5

¶22

Yadav VG

¶23

Judg.910.wpst.15797.17.odt

¶24

grant of ACPS on the touch stone of whether they were having requisite eligibility, the Division Bench issued directions which are contained in paragraph no. 21 of the said Judgment and Order.

¶25

In view of the fact that the Petitioners above named are identically situated as the Petitioners in the said group of Writ Petitions, we propose to follow the same course of action. We accordingly hold that the Petitioners herein would be entitled to the benefit of the ACPS. We accordingly issue the following directions.

¶26

(i) The benefit of ACPS contained in the Government Resolution dated 30^th April 1998 as modified from time to time shall be made available to the Petitioners as is made available to the non-teaching staff of the same category in the private aided Ashram Schools.

¶27

(ii) The appropriate authority appointed by the State Government shall examine the individual cases of the Petitioners for deciding whether they satisfy the criteria laid down for availing the benefit of the ACPS.

¶28

(iii) We make it clear that the Petitioners would be entitled for benefit of the ACPS provided that they satisfy the eligibility criteria for availing benefit of the ACPS which are corresponding to the nonteaching staff of the private aided schools.

¶29

4/5

¶30

Yadav VG

¶31

Judg.910.wpst.15797.17.odt

¶32

The aforesaid exercise to be carried out by the Respondents

¶33

within six months from date.

¶34

Such of the Petitioners who are found entitled to the benefit of the ACPS, the same to be extended expeditiously after a decision has been taken in respect of the same.

¶35

The Writ Petition is allowed to the aforesaid extent. Rule is accordingly made absolute with parties to bear their respective costs.

¶36

(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) (R. M. SAVANT, J.)

¶37

5/5

¶38

Yadav VG

Shivdas Aasupati Thorat and Ors. v. the Asstt. Commissioner, Social Welfare Office and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivdas Aasupati Thorat and Ors. v. the Asstt. Commissioner, Social Welfare Office and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kishor Yashwant Pawan Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Ors.

Shaligram Ramdas Thakur, C/o Jayesh Shaligram Thakur Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Ors.

Shri. Satish Baburao Khodave Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Water Supply and Sanitation Dept. and Ors.

Hind Kamgar Sanghatana through Its Vice-President Vs M/S. Excel Industries Ltd. and Ors.

Shikshan Sangharsha Sanghatana Thru Pres. Smt. Sangita S Shinde and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra Thru Chief Secretary, General Administration Dept. and Ors.

Hind Kamgar Sanghatana through Its Vice-President Vs Oriental Rubber Industries Ltd. and Anr.