The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of two writ petitions in terms of a settlement agreed upon by the landlord and tenant parties, authorized by their power of attorney holders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP-1303-04.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1303 OF 2004 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1353 OF 2003
Prithviraj Rajaramsing Chavan .. Petitioner
versus
Sayed Akhtar Ali Sayyed Mohammed Ali .. Respondent
Mr Mobin H. Shaikh, Advocate holding for Mr. V. R. Dhorde, Advocate for petitioner Mr A. B. Gatne, Advocate for respondent
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 21st August, 2018
ORDER :
2 WP-1303-04.doc
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JUDGE
pnd/-
Prithviraj Rajaramsing Chavan
Sayed Akhtar Ali Sayyed Mohammed Ali
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
