Disposed

Kum. Sushma Marotrao Sudewad v. State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Bombay HC1 Nov 2018WP/12687/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court directed the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee to hear and decide the petitioner's tribe claim for a Town Planner post by 31-1-2019, providing an opportunity to appear on 14-11-2018.

What did the court decide?

Directed STCS Committee to hear and decide petitioner's tribe claim by 31-1-2019 after appearance on 14-11-2018.

Kum. Sushma Marotrao Sudewad Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

wp-12687-18(907).doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 12687 OF 2018

¶3

Kum. Sushma Marotrao Sudewad ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors ..Respondents

¶4

Mr. R. K. Mendadkar a/w Ms Priyanka Shaw for the Petitioner Mrs. R. M.Shinde AGP for the Respondent No.1 State

¶5

CORAM :R. M. SAVANT, & NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ DATE : 1^st NOVEMBER, 2018

¶6

P.C.

¶7

1 The only relief sought by way of the above Petition is that the Respondent No.2 i.e. Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee (for short STCS Committee) be directed to decide the tribe claim of the Petitioner within a particular time frame. The said relief is sought on the ground that the Petitioner has been selected for the post of Town Planner in the State Government in the post meant for the Scheduled Tribe. The tribe claim of the Petitioner is pending before the STCS Committee since June 2017. It is the case of the Petitioner that her near relatives from the paternal side i.e. brother, sister and uncle have already been issued the caste validity certificates.

¶8

2 In the facts and circumstances as above, we deem it appropriate to direct the STCS Committee to hear and decide the Petitioner's tribe claim latest by 31-1-2019 by giving proper opportunity to the Petitioner. The mmj 1 of 2

¶9

wp-12687-18(907).doc

¶10

Petitioner to appear before the STCS Committee on 14-11-2018 and the STCS Committee thereafter to decide the tribe claim of the Petitioner within the outer limit fixed by the instant order.

¶11

3 With the directions as aforesaid the Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶12

4 All parties to act upon an ordinary copy of this order duly authenticated by the Court Shirestedar.

¶13

[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J] [R.M.SAVANT, J]

¶14

2 of 2

¶15

mmj

Kum. Sushma Marotrao Sudewad v. State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kum. Sushma Marotrao Sudewad v. State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Ashok Suklal Shinde Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Mr. S.S. Sahoo, Asstt. Reg. Vs Union of India through the Secretary and Ors.

Jidnyasa Bhaskar Shinde Vs State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Ors.

Nisalp Realties LLP (Formerly Known as Nishalp Realties Private Limited) and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.

Dattatray Bhimashankar Tandale Vs Principal Secretary, Cooperation Marketing and Textile Department and Ors.

Shri. Sunil Laxmman Midgule and Anr. Vs Administrative Officer, Pimpari Chinchwad Municipal Corporation Primary School Board and Ors.