submits that in fact official document would show that the PSM is a nonclinical subject. The learned counsel referred to the conditions of advertisement i.e. 4.4.4 and 5, the MPSC Rules of Procedure 2014 and the short-listing criteria. A reference was also made to the earlier recruitment criteria applied by the MPSC in respect of same post i.e. Director, Health Services, State of Maharashtra. On having a comparative analysis of these rules and criteria, the counsel submitted that this time the MPSC again created confusion which would ultimately benefit the person holding charge of such a important post of Director, Heath Services. Dr. Satish Dhanaji Pawar is to retire after a year or so. The counsel submitted that State and MPSC were successful in somehow delaying the process due to which Dr. Pawar is successful in the office, though his appointment was set aside by the Courts prior to five years. The counsel made reference to criteria of higher experience and qualification (super speciality). The learned counsel further submitted that Dr. Pawar, who is holding charge of Director was suspended for a period between 13/4/2016 to 20/10/2016 during which period one of the applicants, namely, Dr. Jadhav, who is second in the seniority was handed over the charge of Director of Health Services, State of Maharashtra. The charges levelled against Dr. Pawar were serious according to the learned counsel. In the submission of the
