Disposed

Shri. Ashok L. Vaishya v. Omnibus Industrial Development Corp. of Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli Ltd. and Anr.

Bombay HC19 Oct 2018WP/11659/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition filed for quashing a resignation notice due to pending representation. Bench directed respondent to dispose of representation by 31-12-2018 and suspended the notice effect pending decision, with a further two-week grace period if decision is adverse.

What did the court decide?

Directed Respondents to dispose of the petition representation by 31-12-2018; stay of the retirement notice until the representation is disposed or for two weeks thereafter if rejected.

Shri. Ashok L. Vaishya Vs Omnibus Industrial… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

wp-11659-18(904).doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11659 OF 2018

¶3

Ashok L. Vaishya ..Petitioner Vs. OIDC of Daman & Diu & Dadara & Nagar Haveli Ltd. & Anr ..Respondents

¶4

Mr. S. V. Marne for the Petitioner Mr. S. S. Deshmukh for the Respondents

¶5

CORAM :R. M. SAVANT, & NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ DATE : 19^h OCTOBER, 2018

¶6

P.C.

¶7

1 The above Writ Petition has been filed for quashing and setting aside the Notice dated 23-7-2018 Exhibit A to the Petition. By the said notice the Petitioner has been informed that since he has already completed 30 years of qualifying service, he shall retire from service on the forenoon of the day following the day of expiry of three months computed from the date of service of the Notice on him. The said Notice has been issued in exercise of the powers conferred by Rule 48(1)(b) of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972.

¶8

2 After the receipt of the said Notice the Petitioner has made a representation on 6-9-2018 to the Managing Director of the Respondent No.1. It is an undisputed position that the said representation is pending. The Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1 Mr. Deshmukh states that

¶9

1 of 2

¶10

mmj

¶11

wp-11659-18(904).doc

¶12

since the representation of the Petitioner is pending, directions be issued to dispose of the said representation within a particular time frame. We accordingly direct the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 to dispose of the said representation dated 6-9-2018 of the Petitioner latest by 31-12-2018. Till the representation is decided, the impugned notice not to be given effect to and in the event the decision on the representation is against the Petitioner, the same not to be given effect to for a period of two weeks of the communication of the decision of the Respondents to the Petitioner.

¶13

3 With the directions as aforesaid the Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶14

[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J] [R.M.SAVANT, J]

¶15

2 of 2

¶16

mmj

Shri. Ashok L. Vaishya v. Omnibus Industrial Development Corp. of Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli Ltd. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Ashok L. Vaishya v. Omnibus Industrial Development Corp. of Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli Ltd. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Indian Coffee Workers' Co-Op. Society Ltd. Vs the Secretary, Industries Energy and Labour Dpt. and Anr.

M/S Esquire Express and Courier Service and 2 Ors. Vs Union of India and 4 Ors.

Ranjana Prakash Shinde and Ors. Vs M/S Spire Grace Ventures through Its Partner, Shaikh Mehmood

Pratap Sukhadev Koli Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Mrs. Gorety Joseph Ferreira Vs the State of Maharashtra Thru Ld. App of Stateand Ors.

Dipak S/O Abhiman Chavan Vs State of Maharashtra Thru Principal Secretary, Home Dept. and Ors.