In a writ petition, the petitioner sought withdrawal to approach the Enquiry Officer for documents. The High Court allowed and dismissed the petition.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ISM
1 906.11305.18 wp.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11305 OF 2018
Mr. Shaliwahan Mukund Solegaonkar
.....Petitioner
V/s.
Bank of Maharashtra, Head Office/Central Office Pune and others
.....Respondents
Mr. R. D. Joshi for the Petitioner Mrs. R. M. Shinde AGP for the
CORAM : R. M. SAVANT &
NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ. DATE : 31st OCTOBER, 2018.
P.C.
The learned counsel for the Petitioner, after arguing for some time, seeks withdrawal of the above Petition to approach the Enquiry Officer for being provided with the documents in question by the Respondent-Bank. The Petition is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. If any application is filed by the Petitioner before the Enquiry Officer, the Enquiry Officer would consider the same, in accordance with law.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.] [R. M. SAVANT, J.]
ISM
Bank of Maharashtra, Head Office/Central Office Pune
R. M. Savant
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
