Petition for release pending was disposed of as petitioner was already released from prison, rendering the purpose of the writ served.
Criminal writ petition disposed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.111/2018
Devanand s/o Galiram Bale
...Versus...
The State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai – 32 and another
Mrs. S.P. Dhotre, Counsel (Appointed) for petitioner Ms. Shamsi Haider, APP for respondents
The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of the criminal writ petition, the petitioner is released from the prison and is set free. It is stated that the purpose of filing the writ petition stands served due to this development.
Hence, we dispose of the criminal writ petition with no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
Wadkar
Devanand s/o Galiram Bale
The State of Maharashtra
Wadkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
