The High Court of Bombay granted leave to withdraw a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioners against the State of Maharashtra. The court subsequently dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Megha 10_wp_1102_2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1102 OF 2015
Madhukar Bapu Gurav & Anr. …Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...Respondents
Ms Aneeta Vasani i/b. Mr. O.A. Pandey for the Petitioners. Mr. L.P. Satelkar, AGP for the Respondent -State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE AND SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED: 26th JUNE, 2018.
P.C.:-
Ms Aneeta Vasani, the leanred counsel for the Petitioners,
having taken instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave is granted.
(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.)
Megha
1/1
Madhukar Bapu Gurav & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Ranjit More
Anuja Prabhudessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
