The bench disposed of the writ petition observing that the petitioner could resort to alternative remedies. The court declined to exercise writ jurisdiction and maintained the status quo until a specified date.
Petition dismissed. Status-quo continues till 24.09.2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPST25509_18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO.25509 OF 2018
(Indus Towers Limited Vs. Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation and others)
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders, or directions, and Registrar's Orders
Mr. Surel S. Shah i/b. Link Legal India Law Services for Petitioner. Mr. Prashant Kamble i/b. Mr. A. S. Rao for Corporation. Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for State.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, ACTING CJ & R. G. KETKAR, J.
DATE : 11TH SEPTEMBER, 2018
P.C.:
Perused the order dated 14.08.2018 passed by this Court (Coram: A.S.Oka and Riyaz I. Chagla, JJ.) in Civil Application No.1768 of 2018 in Writ Petition No.10497 of 2014.
1/2
WPST25509_18.doc
best known to him.
R. G. KETKAR, J. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
Minal Parab
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this court should exercise its writ jurisdiction given that petitioner initiated substantive proceedings and may resort to alternate remedies.
Indus Towers Limited
Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation
NARESH H. PATIL
R. G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
