Pankaj Chandrakant Walsekar v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
10787.17wp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 10787 OF 2017
Pankaj Chandrakant Walsekar,
Age: 32 years, Occ: Business,
R/o. N-1, Sector-E,
Plot No.335, CIDCO, Aurangabad...PETITIONER
VERSUS
1. The State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary of Industries, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.
2.Maharashtra Industrial
Corporation, through its
Regional Manager, Regional
Office MIDC, Aurangabad,
Industrial Area, Near Railway
Station, Aurangabad.
3. Mahanagar Co-operative Bank Ltd., through its Manager, Hiramani Super Market, Dr. B.A. Road, Lalbaugh, Mumbai 400 012 ..RESPONDENTS
Mr Arvind Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner;
Mr S.S. Dande, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 & 2;
Mr V.R. Dhorde, Advocate for respondent No.3
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE &
MANISH PITALE,JJ.
DATE : 24th AUGUST, 2018
10787.17wp
(2)
ORAL ORDER :
Heard Mr. Deshmukh, learned Counsel
appearing for the petitioner submits that written
instructions are received by him from the
petitioner seeking withdrawal of the petition.
Learned Counsel also placed on record the copy of
communication to him. Same is taken on record and
marked 'X' for identification.
2.In view of the statement made by learned
Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the
petitioner is allowed to withdraw the petition.
The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(MANISH PITALE)(PRASANNA B. VARALE)
JUDGE JUDGE
Tupe
Pankaj Chandrakant Walsekar
The State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary of Industries
Maharashtra Industrial Corporation
Mahanagar Co-operative Bank Ltd.
Prasanna B. Varale
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court