Meena M Agraharkar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10681.16WP
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
WRIT PETITION NO. 10681 OF 2016 WITH CA/5839/2017 IN WP/10681/2016 WITH CA/9379/2017 IN WP/10681/2016 WITH CA/11047/2017 IN WP/10681/2016
MEENA M. AGRAHARKAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for petitioner:Mrs.P.G. Sontakke
AGP for respondent/State:Mr.S.S. Dande
Advocate for respondent no.4 : Mr. B.Y.
Bodkhe holding for Mr. S.S. Thombre
Advocate for respondent no.5 : Mr. V.D.
Salunke
...
CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ. Dated: January 22, 2018
Learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner, on instructions, submits that
pursuant to the order passed by this
Court on 20th June, 2017, the petitioner
has been appointed on the post of
Headmistress of Deshikendra High School,
Latur. She further submits that, the
prayer clause “B” in the Petition stands
10681.16WP
2
fulfilled.
2.In that view of the matter, she has
instructions not to pursue the Petition.
In that view of the matter, Writ Petition
stands disposed of.
3.Needless to observe that in view of
disposal of the Writ Petition itself, the
pending Civil Applications are disposed
of with liberty to the applicants therein
to avail of an appropriate remedy.
(K.K. SONAWANE, J) (S.S. SHINDE,J)
SGA/
Meena M. Agraharkar
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court