Disposed

Kantilal Ramlal Chungade through His Gpa Vedant Shirish Gadiya v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC3 Dec 2018WP/10569/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment allows three writ petitions regarding land acquisition to be withdrawn. The court permitted withdrawal on the basis that the Competent Authority has been constituted and is hearing the grievance, keeping the substantive points open for the Authority.

What did the court decide?

Petitions allowed to be withdrawn. Competent Authority directed to take appropriate decision after hearing parties.

Kantilal Ramlal Chungade through His Gpa Vedant Shirish… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

( 1 ) 15 wp 4955.17

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

15 WRIT PETITION NO. 4955 OF 2017

¶4

SHANTILAL RAMLAL CHUNGADE THROUGH HIS GPA VEDANT SHIRISH GADIYA

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶7

with

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 10569 OF 2017

¶9

KANTILAL RAMLAL CHUNGADE THROUGH HIS GPA VEDANT SHIRISH

¶10

VERSUS

¶11

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶12

with

¶13

WRIT PETITION NO. 5004 OF 2017

¶14

RAVINDRA SHANTILAL PEETY VERSUS

¶15

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶16

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Palodkar Devdatt P. AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. S.S. Dande

¶17

Advocate for Respondents :Mr. Anil S. Bajaj for R/6. Advocate for Respondents : Mr. S.B. Deshpande for R/7.

¶18

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 03.12.2018

¶19

P.C. :-

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioners Mr. Palodkar by way of pursis

¶21

submits before this Court that when the petitions were filed in this Court, the

¶22

Competent Authority was not constituted as per Section 51 of the Right to Fair

¶23

( 2 ) 15 wp 4955.17

¶24

Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The learned counsel then submitted that certain communications are issued by the State Government and the copy of the communications dated 27.06.2018 and 06.08.2018 are placed along with the pursis. It is the submission of Mr. Palodkar that now the petitioners had approached the Competent Authority raising their grievance. Mr.Palodkar then submitted that the Competent Authority is in the process of hearing the parties, as such the petitioners be permitted to withdraw the petitions.

¶25

In view of the statement of the learned counsel, the petitions are allowed to be withdrawn. Needless to state that the Competent Authority will take appropriate decision after hearing the parties as expeditiously as possible. Points raised in the petition are kept open for consideration by the Competent Authority.

¶26

With these observations, the petitions are allowed to be withdrawn and are accordingly disposed of.

¶27

[MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] [PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.]

¶28

mub

Kantilal Ramlal Chungade through His Gpa Vedant Shirish Gadiya v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kantilal Ramlal Chungade through His Gpa Vedant Shirish Gadiya v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nalini Sadhashiv Gophane Vs State of Maharashtra and Others

Jagannath Asaraji Shendge Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Ragho Nimba Mahajan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shantilal Ramlal Chungade through His Gpa Vedant Shirish Gadiya Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Ravindra Shantilal Peety Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Baliram Pandurang Salunke Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others