Criminal writ petition challenging rejection of parole leave application. High Court held application rightly rejected as petitioner evaded arrest and must remain in prison before regular parole. Parole for toilet construction not permitted under 1959 Rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRI.WP105-18
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 105/2018
(BHUMESHWAR MADHAVRAO BRAHMANKAR (IN JAIL) VERSUS THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR DIVISION, NAGPUR & ANOTHER)
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 09, 2018.
By this criminal writ petition, the petitioner challenges the order of the Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur, dated 20.11.2017 rejecting the application of the petitioner for parole leave.
The parole leave application of the petitioner was rejected as the petitioner was required to be arrested by the police authorities and brought back to the prison 1616 days after the due date for surrender.
It is stated on behalf of the respondents that the petitioner was released on furlough leave in the year 2011 and he was required to be brought to the prison by the police in 2015.
In the circumstances of the case, the application of the petitioner for grant of regular parole was rightly rejected by the Divisional Commissioner. It is necessary for the petitioner to remain in the prison at least for a couple of years before seeking regular parole or furlough leave. Moreover, it does not appear from the Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 that a prisoner would be entitled to be released on parole for the construction of a toilet. The daughter of the petitioner is aged seventeen years and she would be able to ensure that the toilet is properly constructed. The petitioner may apply for regular parole or furlough leave after a couple of years as he was out of prison and had evaded the arrest for nearly four years.
2 CRI.WP105-18
Since the order of the Divisional Commissioner is just and proper, we dismiss the criminal writ petition.
Order accordingly.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the rejection of the petitioner's application for parole leave due to failure to return after furlough leave is arbitrary.
Whether parole can be granted for the construction of a toilet for a family member.
Bhumeswar Madhavrao Brahmankar
The Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur Division
Vasanti A Naik
Swapna Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
