Dismissed

Dandoti Shoheb Ahmed Ali Shaikh and Ors. v. Head Master, Muslim Chhaparbuna Urdu Primary School and Ors.

Bombay HC26 Mar 2018WP/10438/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed a writ petition seeking directions to approve posts and backwages. The petition relied on a letter dated September 20, 2012, which the respondent officer swore in affidavit was a fabricated document, casting doubt on the reliefs claimed.

What did the court decide?

The petition for directions to approve posts and grant backwages was dismissed.

Dandoti Shoheb Ahmed Ali Shaikh and Ors. Vs… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶2

WRIT PETITION NO. 10438 OF 2012

¶3

Dandoti Shoheb Ahmed Ali Shaikh and Others. ..Petitioners.

¶4

Versus The Education Officer, ZP Solapur and Another. ..Respondents.

¶5

Mr. S.M. Mirajkar for the Petitioner. Mr. S. B. Kalel, AGP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Amey Sawant i/b Tejasweta Kadam for Respondent No. 1. Mr. A. S. Kulkarni for Respondent No. 4.

¶6

Coram : Ranjit More & Smt. S. S. Jadhav, JJ. Date : March 26, 2018 .

¶7

P. C. :

¶8

Heard learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties. The petition is filed seeking directions to Respondents to approve the posts of Petitioner Nos.1 and 2 on grantable basis along with backwages since the date of their appointment, ie., 6^th July 2011. This relief is claimed relying upon the letter dated 20^th September 2012 written by the then Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Solapur.

¶9

The above letter shows that 100% grant in aid was given to Muslim Chapparbad Urdu Primary School, Solapur with effect from 1997-98.

¶10

The present Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Solapur has filed an affidavit-in-reply dated 23^rd March 2018. He has stated on oath that the letter dated 20^th September 2012 which is

¶11

1 / 2

¶12

patilsr

¶13

shown to have been issued by the Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Solapur, is a fabricated document. Learned Counsel for Respondent No.4 states that the said school was initially granted approval, however, never received grant in aid. That apart, the said school is closed in the year 2011 and management is transferred to Nida Urdu Primary School. There is nothing on record to show as to whether the Petitioners are serving with the said school or not. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner is also not in a position to make any statement in this regard.

¶14

The petition is bereft of merit and the same is, therefore, dismissed.

¶15

[Smt. S. S. JADHAV, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]

¶16

2 / 2

¶17

patilsr

Dandoti Shoheb Ahmed Ali Shaikh and Ors. v. Head Master, Muslim Chhaparbuna Urdu Primary School and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dandoti Shoheb Ahmed Ali Shaikh and Ors. v. Head Master, Muslim Chhaparbuna Urdu Primary School and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mayuresh Bapu Pawar through Mather and Natural Guardian Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, and Ors.

Mrs. Sapna Prashhant Jadhav and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Nazir Mussa Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Sou Kanta Dhananjayrao Gadekar Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Ors.

Arvind Hariba Gawade Vs Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Sangli and Ors.

Anil Amrut Bharsat and Anr. Vs Mahesh Jagannath Chote, Education Officer (Secondary) and Anr.