The High Court Bench at Aurangabad granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition and disposed of the matter as withdrawn.
leave granted to withdraw the petition; writ petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
923 sr.no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
923 WRIT PETITION NO. 10331 OF 2016
VITTHAL SAUDAGAR KHAMKAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Amol D. Lipne h/f Mr. Vikram S. Undre AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.S. Dande
. . .
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATE : 1st March, 2018.
PER COURT:-
Counsel for the petitioner on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
Leave granted.
Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
[K.K.SONAWANE, J] [R.M. BORDE, J]
grt/-
VITTHAL SAUDAGAR KHAMKAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R.M. BORDE
K.K. SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
