The High Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 10265 of 2015 as infructuous due to subsequent developments, rendering the cause of action non-surviving.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 10265 of 2015
Mr.R.D. alias Ram Dadoba Patil ... Petitioner V/s. State Election Commission State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents
Mr.P.D.Paranjape for the petitioner. Mr. P.P.Kakade, AGP for the State. Rishin Mantri i/b. Sachindra B.Shetye for respondent no.1.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, C.J. & M.S.KARNIK, J.
22nd November, 2018.
P.C.
The learned Counsel appearing for petitioner submits that due
to subsequent development, the cause of action does not survive and
petition has become infructuous.
M.S.KARNIK, J CHIEF JUSTICE
L.S. Panjwani, P.S.
Mr.R.D. alias Ram Dadoba Patil
State Election Commission State of Maharashtra & ors.
NARESH H. PATIL
M.S.KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
