Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Appellate Side, Bench at Aurangabad) granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10250.12WP
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
WRIT PETITION NO. 10250 OF 2012
DILIP NARAYAN NIKAM VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.A.N. Nagargoje
AGP for Respondent /State:Ms.S.S. Raut
...
CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & S. M. GAVHANE, JJ. Dated: March 19, 2018
Learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner tendered across the Bar the
copy of the letter written by the
petitioner to the Registry of this Court
on Whatsapp. The same is taken on record
and marked “X” for identification
purpose.
2.Learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner relying upon the contents of
the said letter written by the
petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw
10250.12WP
2
this Petition.
3.Leave granted. Petition is dismissed
as withdrawn.
(S. M. GAVHANE, J) (S.S. SHINDE,J)
SGA/
DILIP NARAYAN NIKAM
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
S.S. SHINDE
S. M. GAVHANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court