Single-judge order in WP No.10184 of 2012 holding an alternate efficacious remedy exists. Petition disposed of without expressing opinion on merits, leaving appropriate remedy open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp10184.12
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.10184 OF 2012
Rajesh s/o Ramesh Sangore,
Age-31 years, Occu:Service,
R/o-Londhri(Kd.), Tq-Jamner,
Dist-Jalgaon
and others.
...PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra,
Through its Secretary,
School Education and
Sports Department,
Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
and others.
...RESPONDENTS
...
Mr.Gajanan K. Kshirsagar Advocate for
Petitioners.
Ms.V.S. Choudhari, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1.
CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND
DATE : 21ST MARCH, 2018
ORDER :
1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the
wp10184.12
2
Petitioners. There is alternate efficacious remedy
for redressal of grievance raised in this
Petition. In that view of the matter, leaving open
appropriate remedy as available in law for
redressal of grievance raised in this Petition,
this Petition stands disposed of.
2.We make it clear that we have not
expressed any opinion on the merits of the
contentions raised in this Petition.
3.In case the Petitioners wish to avail of
an appropriate remedy as available in law, the
concerned Forum, while considering the question of
delay, if any, shall keep in view the fact that
the Petitioners were bona fide prosecuting this
Petition, since the year 2012.
asb/MAR18
Rajesh s/o Ramesh Sangore
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court