Petitioner shifted to alternate accommodation; court found interest protected; writ petition disposed of on counsel's statement.
Petition disposed of by taking statement of learned counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DDR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 10134 OF 2018
Ramesh Baburao Hadke .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Tushar L. Pimple for the petitioner.
Mr. D.R. More for respondent Nos. 2 & 3.
Ms. Kavita Solunke, AGP for respondent No.1.
CORAM : B.R.GAVAI & M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 7th SEPTEMBER , 2018
P.C. :
Shri More, learned Counsel for respondent Nos. 2
and 3 makes a categorical statement that an alternate accommodation is already provided to the petitioner by the Developer and that petitioner is being shifted to the said alternate premises.
we do not find any necessity to proceed with the matter. The
1/2
petition is disposed of by taking the statement of learned
Counsel Shri More on record.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.) ( B.R.GAVAI, J.)
2/2
Ramesh Baburao Hadke
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
