Shri. Dhanraj N. Aswani Vs Pune Municipal Corporation through the Commissioner and Anr.

The learned Counsel appearing for petitioner submits that petitioner being a tax payer is raising the issue of alleged illegal construction. The subject construction is narrated in the petition and

¶11

in the representation addressed to the Commissioner annexed at

¶12

2/2 17wpl10042.18.doc

¶13

Exhibit A. In case the representation is still pending we direct the Commissioner, Pune Municipal Corporation to look into the grievance of the petitioner and take necessary steps.

¶14

Needless to mention that no adverse order shall be passed without giving notice to the owner/occupier of the subject structure. The Commissioner is at liberty to decide if personal hearing would be necessary.

¶15

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, Writ

¶16

Petition stands disposed of.

¶17

R.G. KETKAR, J ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶18

L.S. Panjwani, P.S.

¶19

Digitally Lata signed by LataSunil Panjwani Sunil Date: 2018.09.18 Panjwani 11:57:05 +0530

Shri. Dhanraj N. Aswani v. Pune Municipal Corporation through the Commissioner and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Dhanraj N. Aswani v. Pune Municipal Corporation through the Commissioner and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Peter Dominik Colaso Vs Vasai Virar Municipal Corporation through Its Commissioner and Ors.

Mr. Yaseen Shaikh @ Bachhu Bahi Vs the Municipal Commissioner, Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Smt. Vishalakshmi Rama Safalya, Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

D. R. Services Thru Prop. Shri. Rajkumar B Dhakane Vs Shri. Diwakar Raote , Hon'Ble Minister for Transport , and Ors.