In Tax Appeal No. 20 of 2008, the High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to file a Vakalatnama despite seeking time limit extension.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEAL NO. 20 OF 2008
VARSHA ASHOK HIRANI
... Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR.,
... Respondents
None for the Appellant.
Coram:N. M. JAMDAR & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. Date:26th October 2018
P.C.
None for the Appellant. On 27 August 2018, the advocate for the Appellant had sought time to file Vakalatnama. No Vakalatnama is filed. The appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. N. M. JAMDAR, J.
at*
VARSHA ASHOK HIRANI
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR.
N. M. JAMDAR
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
