This single-paragraph review petition against an order in Writ Petition No.2795 of 2016 finds no error apparent on the face of the record. The High Court of Bombay rejected the review petition without engaging in detailed reasoning.
Review Petition No.67 of 2017 is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902-RPW-67-17.sxw
BDPSPS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITOIN NO.67 OF 2017
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2795 OF 2916
Dahyabhai Paper & Boards Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
….. Petitioners.
V/s
Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority & Ors.
….. Respondents.
Mr. Aneesh Sequeira i/b Ms. Veena R. Advani for the Petitioners. None for the Respondents.
CORAM: B. R. GAVAI &
M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE: 15th FEBRUARY, 2018
P.C.:-
No error apparent on the face of record in the order under review is noticed to warrant review jurisdiction. Hence, Review Petition is rejected.
(M.S. KARNIK, J. ) (B. R. GAVAI, J. )
1/1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dahyabhai Paper & Boards Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority & Ors.
B. R. Gavai
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
