This court reviewed multiple civil applications seeking review of a previous order in a writ petition. The court found no error apparent on the face of the record before it and dismissed all the review petitions filed by the State of Maharashtra.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
924-cao-86-2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.86 OF 2018 IN
REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.6122 OF 2018
The State of Maharashtra and Others vs.
...Petitioners
Maruti Baban Vinode and Another ...Respondents
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.87 OF 2018
IN
REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.6140 OF 2018
The State of Maharashtra ...Petitioner
vs. Rekha Gulab Vinode and Another ...Respondents
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.88 OF 2018 IN
REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.6148 OF 2018
The State of Maharashtra ...Petitioner
vs. Suhas Sahebrao Vinode and Another ...Respondents
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.89 OF 2018
IN
REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.6236 OF 2018
The State of Maharashtra ...Petitioner vs. Shantaram Tabaji Vinode and Another ...Respondents
1/4
Vishal Parekar
924-cao-86-2018.doc
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.90 OF 2018
IN
REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.6255 OF 2018
The State of Maharashtra ...Petitioner
vs.
Shankar Tukaram Wakadkar and Another ...Respondents
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.91 OF 2018 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.5918 OF 2018
The State of Maharashtra ...Petitioner
vs.
Gulab Sopan Vinode and Another ...Respondents
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.92 OF 2018 IN
REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.5864 OF 2018
The State of Maharashtra ...Petitioner vs.
Kunda Tukaram Vinode and Another ...Respondents
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.93 OF 2018 IN
REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.5868 OF 2018
The State of Maharashtra ...Petitioner
vs.
Jalindar Bhausaheb Alhat and Another ...Respondents
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.94 OF 2018 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.5855 OF 2018
2/4
Vishal Parekar
924-cao-86-2018.doc
The State of Maharashtra
...Petitioner
vs.
Ananda Ganpat Vinode and Another ...Respondents
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.95 OF 2018 IN
REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.5913 OF 2018
The State of Maharashtra ...Petitioner
vs.
Tukaram Nivrutti Vinode and Another ...Respondents
Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP for the Petitioners/State.
Mr. Y.S. Jahagirdar, Senior Advocate i/b. Mr. S.M. Sabrad, for the Respondents.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 20, 2018
P.C.:
condonation of delay, we find that sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay. Accordingly the Civil Applications are allowed. 3. By filing these Review Petitions, the Petitioners-State is seeking review of the order dated 14th September, 2016 passed by this Court in Writ Petition Nos. 4022 of 2016, 4823 of 2016, 8509 of 2016, 4830 of 2016, 4027 of 2016, 4824 of 2016, 4821 of 2016, 4825 of 2016, 4820 of 2016 and 4517 of 2016 respectively.
3/4
Vishal Parekar
924-cao-86-2018.doc
(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
4/4
Vishal Parekar
2 issues framed by the court
Whether there is any error apparent on the face of the record warranting interference in the review of an order dropping accused names.
Whether the petitioners have made out a case for review of the impugned order.
The State of Maharashtra
Maruti Baban Vinode and Another
Rekha Gulab Vinode and Another
Suhas Sahebrao Vinode and Another
Shantaram Tabaji Vinode and Another
Shankar Tukaram Wakadkar and Another
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
