Review applications challenging a High Court order denying prior service benefits under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules to regularised applicants were dismissed as no error was apparent on the face of the record.
Review applications dismissed with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 ra 63.18+
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 63 OF 2018 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 7991 OF 2016
Gajrabai Sonba Andhare .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri Anand V. Patil Indrale, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri S. B. Yawalkar, Addl.G.P. for Respondent No. 1. Shri M. N. Navandar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
WITH
REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 64 OF 2018 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 7992 OF 2016
Nagnath Govind Biradar .. Applicant Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri Anand V. Patil Indrale, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri S. B. Yawalkar, Addl.G.P. for Respondent No. 1. Shri B. A. Shinde, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Shri M. N. Navandar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & S. M. GAVHANE, JJ.
DATE : 8 th June, 2018
2 ra 63.18+
PER COURT :
3 ra 63.18+
regularise such employees states that those who are regularised as per Government Resolution they would be governed by the Defined Contributory Pension Scheme (hereinafter referred to 'DCPS') scheme implemented pursuant to Government Resolution dated 31.10.2005. Even the Government Resolution dated 16th November, 2015, gives the list of employees who are regularised and also lays down the condition that these employees would be governed by DCPS and the Government Resolution dated 31.10.2005. The said conditions were never assailed in the petitions.
record. Review Applications, as such, are dismissed. No costs.
[S. M. GAVHANE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
marathe
1 issue framed by the court
Whether no error is apparent on the face of the record warranting a review of the dismissal of writ petitions regarding pension scheme applicability to regularised employees.
Gajrabai Sonba Andhare and Nagnath Govind Biradar
State of Maharashtra
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
S. M. GAVHANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
