Petitioners relinquished grievances after affidavits confirmed industry compliance with environmental standards and court orders. The petition was consequently disposed of without further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DDR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 5 OF 2015
Arun Bhimrao Bhosale & ors. .. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. .. Respondents
Tanaji Mhatugade for the petitioners. Nisha Mehra, AGP for respondent No.1. Ramesh Badi for respondent No.2.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, CJ. & M.S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : 6th DECEMBER, 2018
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the respondent No.2 filed an
affidavit on 2nd August, 2018. In paragraph nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6 it is stated as under :-
“3. I further say that the industry has completely scrapped the Kuccha pond by removing entire water accumulated which was objected by Board as to its compliance however the same has been complied by the industry.
1/2
view of the averments made in the Affidavit the petitioners have no grievance now. Hence the Petition is disposed of.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.) ( CHIEF JUSTICE)
2/2
Arun Bhimrao Bhosale & ors.
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
NARESH H. PATIL
M.S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
