The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw Public Interest Litigation No. 200 of 2014, referencing a prior 2014 Public Interest Litigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8-pil-200-2014.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.200 OF 2014
Ganpat Kalu Gaikwad
...Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Others
...Respondents
Mr. S.M. Oak a/w. Mr. S.A.Joshi, for the Petitioner. Mr. Ganpat Kalu Gaikwad, the Petitioner is present. Mr. Sanjeev Sawant a/w. B.K. Barve, Mr. Sheetal Tanpure and Mr. Santosh Wagh i/b. B.K.Barve & Co., for Respondent Nos. 7 and 8. Mr. D.J. Deshmukh, for Respondent Nos. 9 and 10. Mr. Sandeep Babar, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3.-State.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR &
N. W. SAMBRE, JJ.
DATE : JULY 02, 2018
P.C.:
. Having heard the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner as also learned counsel for the Respondents and keeping in view the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court on 14th July, 2014 in Public Interest Litigation No. 117 of 2014, we allow the Petitioner to withdraw the Petition with liberty to approach the Competent Authority of the Respondents for redressal of his grievances.
(N.W. SAMBRE, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
1/1
Vishal Parekar
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Public Interest Litigation No. 117 of 2014Referred¶1
Ganpat Kalu Gaikwad
The State of Maharashtra
Shantanu Kemkar
N. W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
