The High Court Bench at Aurangabad issued an oral order transferring the Public Interest Litigation to the Principal Seat based on an office note.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
144.18pil
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.144 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14389 OF 2018
Chaitali Ravindra Chaudhari
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & anr.
..RESPONDENTS
Mrs Chaitali R. Kutti Choudhary, Advocate for petitioner; Mr S. Y. Mahajan, A.G.P. for respondent No.1; Mr C. K. Shinde, Advocate for respondent No.2;
Ms. Surekha Mahajan, Advocate holding for Mr A. N. Sabnis, Advocate for applicant in Civil Application No.14389 of 2018
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND
MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 4th December, 2018
ORAL ORDER:
In view of office note dated 29th November, 2018, office to take
necessary steps to transfer the matter at the Principal Seat.
(MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
sjk
Chaitali Ravindra Chaudhari
The State of Maharashtra
Prasanna B. Varale
Mangesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
